Simple strategies, great results!

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Teachers do not always need to employ elaborate classroom management techniques to keep students focused on learning tasks. Alternatively, teacher should consider using a variety of simple strategies (some educators call these strategies classroom procedures) during the course of their lessons.

These uncomplicated classroom procedures could be creatively sprinkled around throughout instructional period to break monotony and enhance the level of interest students have for the subject-matter being learned. At the same time, the procedures demand that students are constantly held responsible for their own learning through elevated sense of awareness of the learning process and its outcomes.

The two most popularly known, easy-to-use classroom procedures are turn-to-your-neighbor and pair-of-pairs.

Turn-to-your-neighbor

This classroom procedure is the easiest to implement, yet yields powerful results in terms of providing students with structured opportunities to consolidate their comprehension of a concept or idea. It could be used as many times as one thinks is appropriate – and in as many context as one could imagine.

For instance, when conducting a typical full-day workshop, I use this method at least three to four times, spread over different learning blocks; e.g. after having introduced and briefly elaborated on the concept of “Teacher Efficacy” I ask teachers to turn-to-their-neighbor and verbally share their understanding of the term (in their own words) to the person seated to the left, right, front, or behind him/her, in addition to providing personal illustrations and/or examples as evidence of mastery of the new concept.

Although the class gets noisy, everyone is given an opportunity to display mastery of the new concept. This elevates pupil’s sense of control and confidence over the subject in a progressive, step-by-step manner, within the context of a safe learning environment (students tend to listen to each other without being judgmental).

In a deeper, psychological sense, this exercise builds up the self-image of each student – as opposed to what happens when a teacher picks a representative sample of the class to gauge if a concept has been understood. Often, teachers tend to pick students who he/she knows have understood the new concept, in which case, the informal assessment results are unrepresentative of the larger and of no value, educationally.

Pair-of-Pairs

To encourage construction or creation of new ideas based on existing knowledge, teachers could use the pair-of-pairs classroom procedure. This method encourages students to stretch their imagination and generate as many creative ideas as possible without feeling threatened or having to feel like he/she is in competition with others.

For example, a teacher could ask students to create a list with a partner (usually someone seated in close proximity); e.g. “list down what would happen to the social and physical environment if multinational companies in Bangkok do not operate within the framework of corporate social responsibility”. As a follow-up, the teacher encourages students to think of and write down as many points as they can.

Once a pair completes the list, the teacher asks this pair to merge the list with another pair (one pair of students joins another pair). The combined list is obviously longer. However, students are asked to carefully examine items in the list to avoid duplication. Students are also required to have logical and/or intuitive reasons for why a particular point/answer is considered as valid in their group.

To make it more “thinking” oriented, teachers could ask students to rank their points, for example from the most effective to least effective, most common to least common, most dangerous to least dangerous, or most practical to least practical. This additional element would require engagement in higher order thinking skills, which serve as an effective interest booster.

Students could be asked to present their refined, well-thought-of list with the rest of the class and be exposed to constructive criticism for mutually-beneficial exchange of ideas.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Get into ‘the zone’

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Published in the Bangkok Post’s Education on May 4, 2010

Establishing the proper ambiance in classrooms and schools can lead to greater creativity

Creativity flourishes in a non-threatening environment that is characterised by high levels of positive emotional experiences and responses. But happiness is not the only ingredient to consider when we think about redesigning schools to cater to the needs of a new, more challenging future, where fluidity in thinking and learning define success.

Creativity is closely connected to another key concept known as “flow” – a state of being that gives birth to vivid creative thoughts and super-human actions, as set out by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, a Hungarian psychologist who literally wrote the book on the topic, which is titled Finding Flow.

When one operates in the state of “flow”, one is highly motivated, focused and totally immersed in the task at hand. Total preoccupation with the task makes all other daily routines and activities unimportant. Because of this focused motivation and highly dedicated execution of a series of deliberate, purposeful actions, the quality of products (in the form of ideas and/or actual creation of something) reflects originality, invariably surpassing the ordinary.

Bliss and creativity

Top athletes like Michael Jordan, a former NBA champion, refer to this optimal state of bliss that contributes to maximum achievement as being in “the zone”. Jordan once described the moment when he made a championship-winning last-second shot.

Jordan said that as soon as the ball touched his hands everything switched to slow motion, all the narrow alleys to the basket opened as wide as a street, he began to soar into the air and the basket became enlarged in size, so much so that he knew he couldn’t miss. There was no room in his awareness for conflicts or contradictions. He had full concentration on the task. He was in “the zone”.

Average people often get into “the zone” or feel “the flow” while performing music, playing cards, creating an object, formulating an idea, studying, or during an exam. Sometimes musicians and artists call this experience “aesthetic rapture”, while pious religious figures call it “ecstasy”. Many names. Same feeling.

Achieving this maximum state of comprehension and creativity can also occur when learning. Not surprisingly, being in “the zone” almost always occurs while the person is happy.

Doing it differently

One problem is that schools don’t often get it right. The focus by schools on providing happiness to students is hedonistic in nature. Educators often hold the view that fun events and activities are sufficient to provide students with positive feelings and energy. Sadly, this kind of happiness is short-lived. Once the event is over or if the event is repeated over and over again, it loses its influence to aid students in getting into “the zone”.

Schools need to look and act beyond external factors to make students happy. Indeed, says Csikszentmihalyi, one can be merely happy being in the sunshine, which is an external factor, but the happiness that follows from “flow” or that occurs when one is in “the zone” is of his or her own internal making, and that the growth during “flow” or while being in “the zone” leads to increased mental complexity and consciousness.

Educators need to acknowledge that true happiness (or the higher level of happiness) that leads to genuine creativity comes from within an individual – particularly when a student feels capable of and competent in doing something worthwhile.

Enemies of ‘the zone’

Unfortunately, there are hurdles to experiencing “flow” or being in “the zone” in the school system. The state of “flow” requires that one is not bound by time and space. In this sense, the nagging bell that announces the beginning and end of classes and the one-classroom-fits-all set-up are the enemies of ever getting into “the zone”. Consequently, students frequently feel unhappy, and their overall creative abilities are diminished.

Another reason for this impediment is regimentation: students go from maths class to science to English without being able to switch back and forth across subjects. While efficient, this is harmful to creative learning and the development of higher-order thinking. Creativity requires an opportunity to be able to look at a number of possible views and scenarios from different angles, before a tenable solution is conceptualized.

Drastic measures needed

It is clearly evident that it is easier to claim to teach creativity than to actually teach it. Schools and educators who are serious about teaching creativity need to reassess their traditional practices – they may need to do away with alarm bells between classes and confining learning within the four walls of the classroom.

They may need to actively engage in cross-curricular instruction and allow students the liberty and opportunity to regularly experience the state of “flow” in an unstructured, resource-full and supportive learning space. Only then will the clarity of a true champion emerge on the playing fields of life.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

First impression

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Unlike in real world, first impressions are formed on a daily basis in the classroom. Impressions are formed every time a teacher introduces a new topic or concept. As such, every new concept taught is perceived in a certain way by students. Some view a new topic positively, some negatively, and some others find themselves between the two. Further, these first impressions affect how a new concept is learned, processed, and assimilated.

Anticipatory set

In education, first impression is affected by whether or not a teacher uses an anticipatory set to start his lessons. This instructional practice is built into lesson planning. Teacher trainers and student-teachers in any teacher training program spend significant amount of time learning about, planning for, and using a variety of anticipatory set in their demonstration lessons. This may range from bringing in a visual aid, showing a short video clip, listening to a short audio clip, sharing a skit, singing a song, involving students in a short game/fun activity, or posing a question that makes everyone think hard for answer.

A teacher who goes straight into lessons without warming up the class by using appropriate anticipatory sets risk losing students’ focus, motivation and interest in learning. Subsequently, students manifest disruptive behaviors that directly originate from boredom, feeling of disconnection from lesson, and a sense of being academically overworked.

Psychological explanation

From information processing perspective, the use of an anticipatory set activates the most important step in the learning process – paying attention. If students do not pay attention, they do not learn. Often, students look like they are paying attention, but closer examination would reveal otherwise. Checking whether or not students pay attention is even more challenging as gathering feedback from every child is not always feasible. A good solution to this is to start every class with an anticipatory set. When creatively applied, it helps capture and retain the attention of every student. Students are hooked to the topic and seldom stray from learning objectives. Consequently, good attention leads to better processing of information in the working, short-term, and long-term memory.

Features

A good anticipatory set is novel, enthusiastically executed, actively involves students, related to objectives of the lesson, provides continuity from previous lesson, activates students’ prior knowledge, gauges readiness for learning, whets appetite for lesson, involves every learner, uses student-friendly language, and gives learners an idea about outcome of the lesson (the big picture). It must also be remembered that anticipatory sets that possess all these features work effectively for all levels of learners (achievement level and age are not barriers to how learners respond to anticipatory sets).

Examples

A lesson on Parts of Sentences could begin by the teacher coming into classroom and throwing a ball or stuffed toy to a child and asking everyone else, “What did I just do?” Students’ answers are written on the board and used for discussion later. In this scenario, the teacher has used both visual and kinesthetic modalities to activate curiosity to learn.

My favorite anticipatory set when teaching the topic of Intelligence is asking students to write down the name of the most intelligent person they know (in the class or outside) and list down three reasons for saying so. I collect all the answers and share with the rest of the class. This exercise excites everyone, especially those considered to be the most intelligent. The emphasis though is not on who is the most intelligent. (Inductively) identifying characteristics of and defining intelligence as a psychological construct are the learning objectives targeted through the use of this anticipatory set.

A lesson on Metamorphosis could begin with a story about a caterpillar that went missing and later found in a different form.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Control and Learning

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Having attended many seminars and workshops, I have come to recognize that a learning session could be exciting or boring. It could also be frightening and overwhelming, especially when there is a vast disparity between a speaker’s frame of reference and that of the participants.

Almost always, participants in a learning session become disheartened by not being allowed to experience a sense of control over the process and the overall environment of learning.

Basic need

While attempting to control something or someone is seen as not very healthy, experiencing a sense of control is crucial to human existence. An individual who does not feel that he is in control of things will constantly fear the next possible event in his life. This relates directly to a sense of efficacy – the belief that one can effect positive changes in and around himself.

The belief in the ability to accomplish something is more important than the ability itself. This explains why people can sometimes teach themselves a new trade or trick even though no one expects them to be able to do so because they are not perceived to have the necessary abilities.

Individuals with a high level of efficacy believe in their potential to accomplish a task. The strong belief motivates them to do everything possible to gain mastery. Mastery, in return, brings about a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction, progressing into a feeling of being in control as mastery affects, and is affected by, achievements.

Like other needs, the need for control over one’s own environment and life experiences is necessarily a basic psychological need that empowers an individual to become confident in accomplishing challenging tasks in life. Without it, one feels disempowered. Disempowerment is the leading cause for frustration, underperformance and lack of interest or motivation.

Case in point

Notice the facial expressions, body language and willingness to strike and keep a conversation among passengers in an airplane that is about to take off from a particular destination for another. One could conclude that most passengers would look resentful and uptight. I have travelled by air many times and this is the pattern that I have observed on all flights.

However, the opposite is true for the same passengers when the airplane is about to land at the destination (arrival). As the airplane approaches the terminal, people stand up, smile at each other, talk more, and present a more pleasant and positive aura compared to when they started. Why is this so?

The answer lies in the fact that passengers don’t feel a sense of control over their journey. In their minds, they have placed their lives in the hands of pilots and flight attendants whom they don’t know well enough to trust.

This is a good example of when the “sense of control” is completely taken away from individuals and the only way to feel a certain amount of control is by knowing more about the journey, getting updates from the pilot, walking around in the airplane, and, for people like me, sitting by the window to make sure that we are still flying.

The moment an airplane lands at its destination, the passengers experience an exhilarated sense of freedom that comes from the feeling of being in control of their own safety. They become happier because they are able to deliberately choose how safety is defined and pursued.

Application for learning

In the classroom, ensuring that students experience a sense of control over their learning is an essential ingredient for success. I have seen many students who initially possess zero ability but shoot up almost instantly when they are allowed to be in control of their own learning. There are several ways to make this a possibility:

Incorporate students’ voice into teaching: Listen to students and take into consideration what they have got to say about what to learn, how to learn, and how to assess learning. When students’ voices are heard, and when their suggestions are gratefully incorporated into teaching, they feel on top of things.

Focus on mastery: Although students differ in abilities, they are similar when it comes to needing to experience a sense of control. One sure way to help students feel in control of learning is by helping them gain competency in lessons.

Often, this would imply providing individual attention to a struggling student. While teachers may argue that this is difficult and impractical, we should not forget that a jump-start (short-term cognitive scaffolding), rather than a long haul of direct instruction, is sufficient to empower a child.

Provide opportunities for problem-solving: Students who are engaged in problem-solving (academic or non-academic) become independent thinkers, responsible citizens and sensitive human connectors. These characteristics provide room for personal growth and an expansion for the sense of being in control of oneself and one’s life experiences[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Critical Thinking (Chapter 8 – Part II)

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

 What to think?

› How to think?

How is critical thinking different from problem-solving?

Critical thinking…

  1. Does not aim at solving problems (although it might do so in the process) – looks at an issue from the viewpoint of several other interrelated (or un-interrelated) issues
  2. Addresses internal states of the mind – values, beliefs, expectations, etc. (while problem-solving focuses on external issues)

Critical thinking is…

  1. Reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do
  2. Better thinking
  3. Distinguishing between thinking that is directed at clarifying (expounding) a goal

Twelve Critical Thinking Abilities (Ennis, 1987):

  1. Focusing on the question
  2. Analyzing arguments
  3. Asking and answering questions of clarification
  4. Judging the credibility of a source
  5. Observing and judging observational reports
  6. Deducing and judging deductions
  7. Inducing and judging inductions
  8. Making value judgments (evaluation)
  9. Defining terms and judging definitions
  10. Identifying assumptions
  11. Deciding on an action
  12. Interaction with others

Some terms clarified…

  1. Knowledge– tool to think critically
  2. Inference– making connection between two or more units of knowledge
  3. Deduction– understanding a particular unit of knowledge by using already existing units of knowledge
  4. Induction– discovering a particular unit of knowledge (often new) from the observation and gathering of different units of knowledge from a variety of settings (time and space)
  5. Evaluation– decision-making – includes analyzing, judging, weighing, and making value judgments
  6. Metacognition– ability to analyze one’s own decisions

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Chapter 6: Belief about Self

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Questions:

› What are some of the factors that contribute toward the success of students at school?

› What are some of the factors that contribute toward the failure of students at school?

› Which one of these factors do you think is the most common (for both success and failure)?

› Which one do you think is the most difficult to deal with (for failure)?

Chapter Outline

  1. Social cognitive theory (relationship between self-confidence and learning)
  2. Attribution theory (how students explain their academic success and failure to themselves)
  3. Student control and autonomy (how students’ and teachers’ expectations create a controlling or autonomy-producing environment in the classroom)

Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura)

Questions:

› What is self-confidence? What is it not?

› Where does it come from?

› How can it be improved?

Bandura’s ‘reciprocal determinism’ states that learning is the result of an interaction among the following variables:

click on this link for the diagram…

reciprocal determinism diagram.doc

Personal

(Self-efficacy judgment & outcome expectancy)

Beliefs and attitudes that affect learning

Environment (Teacher, parent, and peer feedback) – role of significant others

Behavioral (performance) – responses one makes in a given situation – Effort? Luck?

Before I engage in anything, I…

  1. Need to have self-belief that I will be able to do it, (“I can do it”)
  2. Know that I will experience something NICE as a result of that behavior (“It’s worth doing it”)

Give examples for the above mentioned assertion.

Self-efficacy = the degree to which an individual possesses confidence in his/her ability to achieve a goal

Outcome expectancy = the perceived relationship between performing a task successfully and receiving a specific outcome as a consequence of that performance

E.g. I am a good driver, with superb driving abilities. Nevertheless, I am still exposed to chances of accidents because people (in this particular area) like to drink and drive recklessly.

How does this affect my thoughts toward my abilities in driving? How does this affect my actual driving skills?

Two types of learning

  1. Enactive learning = learning by doing
  2. Vicarious learning = learning from a model

The more I do something successfully, the more I do it with great confidence!

Learning (in general) is affected by:

  1. Developmental status of the learner
  2. Prestige of the model
  3. One’s ability to set an attainable goal (specific, attainable, of moderate difficulty)
  4. any other factors you want to suggest???

Self-efficacy

Illustration: Story of the drunken father with two sons – One son determined never to become like his father. The other one used his father as an excuse to follow in his footsteps – same environment but different self-belief and attitudes

Self-efficacy is DOMAIN SPECIFIC

Linked strongly with behavioral outcomes (expectancy) and environmental cues (feedback)

Positively affects performance and vice versa

Indirectly affects future learning by predisposing students to engage in challenging tasks and to persist longer despite initial failures

Differ along three dimensions:

  1. Task difficulty
  2. Generality (domain specificity)
  3. Strength of one’s efficacy judgment (weak vs. strong perceptions)

Students with higher efficacy will be more inclined to persist and to maintain self-confidence!

Dependent also on:

  1. Successful performance (initial ones esp.)
  2. Model is judged to be similar in ability (teacher vs. peer)
  3. Verbal persuasion
  4. One’s psychological state

Questions:

  1. What does it mean to have control (or be in control) in the classroom while learning?
  2. What are the characteristics of caring teachers, who would enhance students’ learning to the maximum?
  3. Why do you think that “the number of years teachers spend in the classroom negatively affect their efficacy?”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Chapter 2: Sensory, Short-Term/Working, and Long-Term Memory

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

“Minds are like parachutes – they only function when open”
– Thomas Dewar

Memory (psychology) – processes by which people and other organisms encode, store, and retrieve information. Encoding refers to the initial perception and registration of information. Storage is the retention of encoded information over time. Retrieval refers to the processes involved in using stored information. Whenever people successfully recall a prior experience, they must have encoded, stored, and retrieved information about the experience. Conversely, memory failure-for example, forgetting an important fact-reflects a breakdown in one of these stages of memory.

Memory is critical to humans and all other living organisms. Practically all of our daily activities-talking, understanding, reading, socializing-depend on our having learned and stored information about our environments. Memory allows us to retrieve events from the distant past or from moments ago. It enables us to learn new skills and to form habits. Without the ability to access past experiences or information, we would be unable to comprehend language, recognize our friends and family members, find our way home, or even tie a shoe. Life would be a series of disconnected experiences, each one new and unfamiliar. Without any sort of memory, humans would quickly perish.

Without memory we would be wanderers in a world that was perpetually new and unfamiliar. There are two methods psychologists use to study memory. The first is through self-reporting (introspection), and this approach involves asking participants to record the way they remember and forget. The second method is naturalistic study, and is often experimental in nature. Naturalistic experiments attempt to reproduce events that are more representative of real life, and participants are often asked to remember natural material such as stories, films, events, maps or other visualised material, instead of lists of letters, nonsense syllables or digits

Click on the Link Below:

The Modal Model of Memory1.ppt

The basic characteristics of the model include:

  1. the existence of several linked processing systems;
  2. stage-by-stage processing of information;
  3. a unidirectional flow of information.

The modal model, or multistore model, of memory has become one of the most well-known theoretical memory models. The creators of this approach hypothesize that all parts of the memory system can be divided into two main categories: the control processes and the permanent structure. The control processes are the procedures that one performs in order to encode, maintain, and retrieve memories. The permanent structure includes the different memory stores, which are described in detail below.

The Sensory Store

The sensory store, or the register, records information that comes in through the senses. The information only remains in this store for a few seconds after the stimulus is gone.

The two senses that have been studied the most in terms of their role in memory are vision and hearing. The term “iconic memory” refers to visual impressions in the sensory store. Auditory information that enters the sensory store is called “echoic memory”. One’s iconic memory might hold, for instance, the visual impression of a firework, while the echoic memory will hold for a few seconds the loud noise of the firework.

Most of the information in the sensory store vanishes forever after a few seconds. If all of these information were kept and focused on, we would be so bombarded with stimuli that we would be unable to function. Instead, the brain is constantly going through a selection process to decide which sensory memories are necessary to keep and which should be thrown away. The information that is kept and processed passes into the short-term memory store.

  • visual sensory is very limited. Only seven to nine pieces of information are processed at any given time, and much of that decays rapidly. Information held in visual sensory memory receives only limited processing (less than 0.5 second for iconic register and recall)
  • auditory register and recall (echo) – slightly more than 3 seconds – ability of the echo to retain information seems related to the processing of language
  • Knowledge and context play important role in our perceptual processes – previous knowledge and past experiences!
  • attention = a person’s allocation of cognitive resources to the task at hand
  • attention is maximized if one engages in resource-limited tasks (focusing on one task at a time – e.g. watching television while reading?) and avoid data-limited tasks (tasks that you do not possess much knowledge and skills about) – e.g. learning advanced math without having proper foundation in basic math
  • the role of automatic processes (vs. controlled processes) – require fewer cognitive resources than nonautomated processes

Q: Will being exposed to stimuli from various modality (visual, auditory, gustatory, tactile/haptic, olfactory, etc.) help to enhance memorization of a particular experience? Why do you say so? – enhancement in exposure!

Sensory memory briefly processes a limited amount of incoming stimuli. Visual registers hold about 7 to 9 pieces of information for about 0.5 second. Auditory registers hold about 5 to 7 pieces of information for up to 4 seconds. Incoming stimuli are perceived, then matched to a recognizable pattern, and then assigned a meaning. How much information we can process depends on two things: 1)the complexity of the information and 2)our available resources. Automated tasks are easy to perform because they require fewer attentional resources. Resource-limited tasks are difficult no matter how much attention we allocate because the information itself is deficient.


Short-Term Memory (7 plus/minus 2) – 
the size of the chunks doesn’t really matter!

The short-term memory store holds memories for about thirty seconds. Much of this memory is then forgotten. However, the more important information is then transferred into the long-term memory store. The brain engages in this process naturally, but we can also to an extent control this process by rehearsing, or repeating new memory in order to encode it.

Short-term memory is often referred to as “working memory”. This is because the short-term memory store does not only hold memories, but it also manipulates information and uses it to perform tasks. Working memory consists of three parts. The first component involves perceived sounds, and the second is concerned with visual and spatial information. The third part, the “central executive”, uses information from the first two parts as well as from the long-term memory store.

Like sensory memory, the capacity and duration of short-term memory are quite limited. We hold approximately 7 (plus/minus 2) pieces of information in working memory at a time. This information is forgotten quickly because of interference, decay, and replacement by new information.

The working memory includes a central executive, articulatory loop, and visual-spatial sketch pad. The central executive coordinates the two remaining slave systems, which are responsible for maintenance of verbal and spatial information. Research suggests that each subsystem possesses some unique resources that enable individuals to distribute information processing load.

How do we access information in the STM?

people search the contents of short-term memory in a serial (search one by one) and exhaustive (detailed and meticulous – going through all the items) fashion NOT parallel or search all item in memory simulataneously and self-terminating or ending search when one finds something he/she is looking for

Long-Term Memory

The long-term memory store contains nearly all of what we consider our memory. There are several ways to code memory into this store, some more effective than others. One technique used to improve encoding is elaboration, the connecting of new information to information already in the long-term store. Elaboration may be conscious, such as when mnemonic devices are used, or it may be unconscious.

Note: It is possible for information to enter long-term memory (LTM) without ever entering short-term memory (STM). Researchers have found that individuals with severe STM damage still somehow encode new memories into LTM.

Cognitive Load Theory

States that learning is constrained by limited processing capacity. The higher the cognitive load of the to-be-learned information, the harder it is to learn that information (in other words, minimizing the number of internal mental processes that take place in the ‘mind’ enhances the process of learning)

  • intrinsic cognitive load – caused by the inherent properties of the to-be-learned information and is unalterableother than by schema acquisition
  • extraneous cognitive load – results from the manner in which to-be-learned information is presented or from activities required of the learner

For additional reading and reinforcement:

Sensory memory is everything that you are exposed to at a given instant in time. The best way to think of sensory memory is to consider what happens as you watch a ice-hockey game. You are constantly aware of the location of all the players, but two seconds later as the play continues, you are unable to recall where each player was on the ice.

Short term memory (STM) does not have a lot of capacity and it doesn’t last very long (5-7 seconds). An example of short term memory is when someone gives you a phone number to remember and you forget it before you get to dial the number.

Long term memory (LTM) on the other hand lasts indefinitely, like your student ID number.

It used to be thought that the process of remembering was like an “assembly line” and that stimuli (words, pictures, actions etc.) passed from one station on the assembly line to the next (unidirectional flow of information)

Working Memory: A Modern Advance (needed because STM cannot explain the kind of processes that took place in it)

In the early 1990s, Alan Baddeley (University of York, UK) and his colleagues proposed a newer model of memory: with an additional component known as the working memory.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Problem-Solving (Chapter 8 – Part I)

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Effective problem-solvers engage in the following steps…

  1. Identify the problem(awareness of the problem and the ability to define the problem concretely)

Possible difficulties to engage in this step?

  1. ‘Not in the habit’
  2. Lack background knowledge (affects awareness – e.g. Math problems)

iii. Do not spend TIME to reflect

Required disposition?

  1. Open-minded (not affected by first impression – react vs. respond)
  2. Engage in exploratory activities

iii.llow problem and solution to evolve (consider it an ongoing process)

  1. Divergent thinking
  2. Re-presenting the problem(helps in analyzing the problem)

› Abstraction

›  Visualization (graph, picture, story, etc.)

› Ability to think across events, experiences, and knowledge domains

› Goal state = “what you want to accomplish once the problem is solved?”

  1. Selecting an appropriate strategy
  2. trial-and-error = no strategic plan whatsoever
  3. means-ends analysis = sequence of steps identified, implemented, and evaluated individually
  4. formulate a goal state
  5. break down the problem into smaller sub-problems
  6. evaluate the success of one’s performance ateach step before proceeding to the next
  7. Implement the strategy

› success at this stage depends on success at stages 1-3

› strategy shifting = change strategies more often

› strengthened by previous experiences dealing with problem resolution

› quick solution vs. solution-after-analysis & understanding of the problem

  1. Evaluating solutions

› of product and then process

› opportunity to IMPROVE and do better in the future

› usefulness and applicability of a particular strategy checked

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Chapter 7: Beliefs about Intelligence and Knowledge

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Belief about intelligence and knowledge affects academic performance of learners (thinking and learning)

Two types of intelligence:

  1. Fixed(entity theory)
  2. Changeable(incremental theory)

The type of belief learners hold about intelligence – (1) or (2) – give rise to the following learning goals:

Those who believe that intelligence is fixed – hold and cherish PERFORMANCE GOALS = strong desire to demonstrate one’s performance and to achieve normatively (for name sake) high success in a domain (show off?)

Characteristics:

  1. Surface/superficial learning
  2. Less persistent
  3. Less apt to use learning strategies
  4. attribute failure toability and teacher
  5. May developlearned helplessness (defense against perceived incompetence – “anything I do will fail…so why try?”)
  6. Engage in external locus of control

Those who believe that intelligence is changeable – hold and cherish LEARNING GOALS = strong desire to improve one’s performance and achieve mastery in a domain; also called mastery goals (doing something for my own sake…for the sake of learning and improving as a person)

Characteristics:

  1. More persistent
  2. More likely to use learning strategies
  3. Attribute their success to strategy use and effort
  4. “I can improve if I polish my ways of studying and put in more effort”
  5. Engage in internal locus of control

Questions:

› How would you define knowledge?

› What is the origin of knowledge?

› It’s nature?

› What are some of the characteristics of knowledge?

How you perceive ‘knowledge’ affects the way you think and learn!Those who hold the following beliefs about knowledge engage in more sophisticated forms of thinking:

  1. Knowledge is complex
  2. Knowledge is relative
  3. Learning is incremental (change in quantity and quality)
  4. Ability to learn is not innately determined (Q: any real life example for this?)

Developmental Sequence that individuals pass through on their way to mature reasoning about ‘knowledge’:

  1. Dualist stage– right or wrong, quick learning, absolute, universally certain, accessible only to authorities, look for fact-oriented info, remember info becomes important
  2. Relativist stage– uncertain and relative, knowledge must e evaluated on a personal basis by using the best available evidence, look for context-oriented info, construction of meaning, gradual learning, tentative and subject to personal interpretation (Bruce Lee!)

Performance differences between the two orientations do exist…!!!

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Definitions of self constructs

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Self-esteem: Self-esteem refers to general feelings of self-worth or self-value.

Self-efficacy: Self-efficacy is belief in one’s capacity to succeed at tasks. General self-efficacy is belief in one’s general capacity to handle tasks. Specific self-efficacy refers to beliefs about one’s ability to perform specific tasks (e.g., driving, public speaking, studying, etc.)

Self-confidence: Self-confidence refers to belief in one’s personal worth and likelihood of succeeding. Self-confidence is a combination of self-esteem and general self-efficacy.

Self-concept: Self-concept is the nature and organization of beliefs about one’s self. Self-concept is theorized to be multi-dimensional. For example, people have separate beliefs about physical, emotional, social, etc. aspects of themselves.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]